The task of reconstructing unknown textual inputs to language models is a fundamental auditing primitive that allows us to assess the model's vulnerability to a range of security issues, including stealing hidden system prompts, detecting backdoors, and leaking private data. Existing inversion works assume access to differing levels of information (e.g. requiring input-output examples, the model parameters, intermediate activations or output logits) but oftentimes fail to fully reconstruct the desired input. In this paper, we present the Sparse One-hot Discrete Adam (SODA) algorithm, a search-based inversion method that can accurately reconstruct the input text, given white-box access to the language model and its output. Our experiments demonstrate for the first time that exact language model inversion is possible on both natural language and random inputs. Indeed, SODA achieves respectively 98% and 79% reconstruction rates on inputs with lengths up to 10 tokens. Furthermore, we show that input length and vocabulary size have a far greater impact on the probability of a successful reconstruction than the size of the language model itself, thus allowing us to scale to models from 33M to 3B parameters.

Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Neural Activation Function - Shows improvement over swish in some cases. Gradient Centralization: A New Optimization Technique for Deep Neural Networks - Basically just makes the mean of all weights excluding output layer to 0 E-Swish - [1801.07145] E-swish: Adjusting Activations to Different Network Depths - Adds a term to swish and shows that in some cases a parameterized swish provides better results. On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyond - Uses smaller learning rates in first few epochs essentially just to get enough samples so that the variance of adaptive LR doesn't explode and causes detrimental learn rates in the first few steps. Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back - maintains two optimizers/weights, one with a larger and more reactive learn rate, one with a smaller more stable learn rate.

In marketing we are often confronted with a continuous stream of responses to marketing messages. Such streaming data provide invaluable information regarding message effectiveness and segmentation. However, streaming data are hard to analyze using conventional methods: their high volume and the fact that they are continuously augmented means that it takes considerable time to analyze them. We propose a method for estimating a finite mixture of logistic regression models which can be used to cluster customers based on a continuous stream of responses. This method, which we coin oFMLR, allows segments to be identified in data streams or extremely large static datasets. Contrary to black box algorithms, oFMLR provides model estimates that are directly interpretable. We first introduce oFMLR, explaining in passing general topics such as online estimation and the EM algorithm, making this paper a high level overview of possible methods of dealing with large data streams in marketing practice. Next, we discuss model convergence, identifiability, and relations to alternative, Bayesian, methods; we also identify more general issues that arise from dealing with continuously augmented data sets. Finally, we introduce the oFMLR [R] package and evaluate the method by numerical simulation and by analyzing a large customer clickstream dataset.

Summary: We show in illustrations how the machine learning'training' process happens in Tensorflow, and tie them back to the Tensorflow code. This paves the way for discussing'training' variations, namely stochastic/mini-batch/batch, and adaptive learning rate gradient descent. The'training' variation code snippets presented serve to reinforce the understanding of the role of Tensorflow placeholders. In the previous article, we used Tensorflow (TF) to build and learn a linear regression model with a single feature so that given a feature value (house size/sqm), we can predict the outcome (house price/). In machine learning (ML) literature, we come across the term'training' very often, let us literally look at what that means in TF.

The current paradigm in student modeling has continued to show the power of its simplifying assumption of knowledge as a binary and monotonically increasing construct, the value of which directly causes the outcome of student answers to questions. Recent efforts have focused on optimizing the prediction accuracy of responses to questions using student models. Incorporating individual student parameter interactions has been an interpretable and principled approach which has improved the performance of this task, as demonstrated by its application in the 2010 KDD Cup challenge on Educational Data. Performance prediction, however, can have limited practical utility. The greatest utility of such student models can be their ability to model the tutor and the attributes of the tutor which are causing learning. Harnessing the same simplifying assumption of learning used in student modeling, we can turn this model on its head to effectively tease out the tutor attributes causing learning and begin to optimize the tutor model to benefit the student model.